Out of many different applications of AHP, this article covers a select few, which could be of wide interest to the researchers and practitioners. Saaty in the 1970s, AHP, or Analytic Hierarchy Process, is a technique for group decision making wherein the problem is decomposed into a. AHP is a multiple criteria decision-making tool that has been used in almost all the applications related with decision-making. This tutorial illustrates the procedural steps of the AHP in supporting group decision making about new healthcare technology, including (1) identifying the decision goal, decision criteria, and alternative healthcare technologies to compare, (2) structuring the decision criteria, (3) judging the value of the alternative technologies on each decision criterion, (4) judging the importance of the decision criteria, (5) calculating group judgments, (6) analyzing the inconsistency in judgments, (7) calculating the overall value of the technologies, and (8) conducting sensitivity analyses. The AHP MCDM Method Developed by Thomas L. This gives a confidence to decision maker that his intuitions and experience are not overlooked in arriving to the final ranking of the alternatives. The AHP can aid decision makers in selecting the most valuable technology for patients, while taking into account multiple, and even conflicting, decision criteria. A decision maker has an ease in converting its subjective opinion into objective one while implementing AHP for a real-life problem. 1, the AHP method has a proven and effective way to handle complicated decision making and can help in analyzing the data collected. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been increasingly applied as a technique for multi-criteria decision analysis in healthcare. Thus, this paper considers an approach based on WeFA framework and Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in Multiple. The AHP facilitates the decision makers in discussing and valuing the multiple outcomes of alternative healthcare technologies.
0 kommentar(er)
